Philipp Hortig

Hi Levente, thank for your fast response. The queue submodules in the expressMacLayer and preemptableMacLayer are still there. Ok, so do I understand it right, that in this case the...

Hello Levente, Thanks for the hint using the server module. Using an InstantServer module directly behind the queue module worked. But in the meantime I figuered out, that one step...

Thank you for your offered help! here you can find the files that I modified to get to the point I showed above: [tasandfp_modifications.zip](https://github.com/inet-framework/inet/files/11602253/tasandfp_modifications.zip) (updated 6:28pm GMT+2) **simpleTestNetwork/omnet.ini** : To...

Thank you for the update. In the long term I would like to also insert the CBS in the queue submodule of the preemtableMacLayer. (Maybe you saw the uncommented part...

Yes, unfortunately the drawback with executing the frame preemption when the express mac layer gate opens is, that the express packets will be delayed by a small amount of time....

Thank you for the detailed explanation about the internal mechanism with the added Bytes to the preempted frame and updating the branch. As a conclusion, I would suggest that we...

Ok, I understand. So now if we want to use the implicit guardband reasonably with FP+TAS, canPacketFlowThrough() needs further consideration of preemption, right? I would like very much to experiment...

The condition, upon which I want to preempt the AVB frame, is the **AVB gate closing event,** because I want the higher express frames to be completely isolated temporally. (As...

Thank you Levente for your suggestion and fast response. The approach with subscribing to a signal sent by the respective periodicGate worked for me already well partially as you can...

I could already solve this issue with a first approach by subscribing the `gateStateChangedSignal` in the preemptableStreamer.Transmission of the fragment (`remainingPacket`) is disabled as long as the associated gate is...