Phil Miller - NOAA
Phil Miller - NOAA
This sounds at least superficially reasonable. I'll think about it more tomorrow.
I realize there's a tension/inconsistency between different points of your proposal. As in your point 3, I believe that readiness to handle messages in an epoch needs to be on...
Had a thought earlier today, which may or may not be a productive direction: The chain manager can arrange things so that none of the messages in a chain actually...
I think at this point, we've seen that the current design works well enough, and I don't think we're going to make any sort of big change in semantics before...
Should we remove new developers as assignees on this issue once we've confirmed they've completed the checklist?
I just noticed - it doesn't look like any learning from the vt tutorial or whatever is included on the checklist, just building and running the code
Title should read LDMS?
Also, vt's internal diagnostics seem to be perfect for feeding out to LDMS.
Per discussion with Jonathan, we just want to get the stack pushing and popping working, and worry about chaining successive 'pieces' of a single handler's run on a suspending thread...
I remember discussing a good protocol for detecting exactly these issues. Maybe check the issue or PR in which we introduced this kind of insertion.