Dylan Perks
Dylan Perks
> that allow types to be augmented with additional members and (eventually) interfaces. Is the "for" syntax a placeholder? It feels like it wouldn't be too much hard to just...
```cs public extension SuperExt for Guid : BaseExt; ``` Surely the `SuperExt` will be `for` the type of the `BaseExt`? I don't see a world in which you can extend...
Ahhhhhhh damn, foiled by OOP again!
Perhaps ```cs public extension StringExtensions : ObjectExtensions ``` as this reads as "public extension of string extending the ObjectExtensions extension". This is noisier, but is also akin to the existing...
Ah missed that one (just went straight to the latest issue), thanks.
Wow I had no idea the C# team were so young ;) > ```cs > private readonly Dictionary _nameToAge = [ > "Cyrus": 21, > "Dustin": 22, > "Mads": 23,...
There is very limited support for this already (see [here](https://github.com/dotnet/ClangSharp/blob/main/tests/ClangSharp.PInvokeGenerator.UnitTests/CSharpPreviewWindows/FunctionDeclarationBodyImportTest.cs)) but it is unlikely to work for very complex cases like entire programs (these code paths iirc have been added...
Logs for last builds are still available: https://github.com/dotnet/Silk.NET/actions/workflows/angle.yml Essentially when cloning recursively and building we quickly passed the actions limits. If we can figure out a way to cross-compile (a...
@dependabot rebase
This is ready for a pre-WG review.