Peiwei Hu

ICYMI, `Convert px[ dDhHwWqQol] to new shell` -> https://github.com/rizinorg/rizin/pull/2813

`pD` is ported already.

Do the names/indexes mean one can pass multiple names/indexes? So the function signature looks like: `bool rz_table_set_val(RzTable *t, RZList *items, const char *arg, ...)`

I am a little bit confused before getting to it and I would really appreciate the further explaination. We are not going to remove the concept of `core->block`, right? Just...

Could you please explain more details of the expected "enriched" rzil output? Thank you! @XVilka

> @PeiweiHu Hi! Any progress with this? Would be nice to get this merged before the release (roughly in 2 weeks or so). Too busy these days. But I think...

The output before and after adopting PR is different during the test: ``` ASAN_OPTIONS=detect_leaks=0:detect_odr_violation=0:allocator_may_return_null=1 rz-test test/db/analysis/dalvik ``` The error is shown as follows. But I don't understand why this PR...

I am on it.