Paul Uithol
Paul Uithol
Is anybody else in favor (or opposing to) of making this change? The call to `pluck` would also have to be changed btw.
Well, that's very much possible. I've never used `clone`, didn't even know I missed it, and no-one complained up till now ;). I'll take a look when time permits.
Hmm.. after thinking about it for a bit, I wouldn't quite know how the semantics should work with regards to `HasOne` and `HasMany` relations? I've taken a quick look at...
Ok, for now I've at least made sure clone doesn't break existing HasOne relations; I'm still not quite sure how to proceed, so for now relations simply aren't cloned at...
I've no idea, to be honest... Never really used the subModel feature myself.
What do you mean by this exactly? Do you have a code snippet? The new child models aren't just created out of thin air I guess?
If the child models are in a collection on the parent model and are created on the server because the parent got saved, maybe [`findModel`](http://backbonerelational.org/#RelationalModel-findModel) is what you're looking for?...
@corps, thanks for sharing your work so far! I like the concept a lot, obviously; we could use a speed boost, and this looks like a pretty sane upgrade. I'm...
I'm pondering what the best place is to let this implementation live; the `store` seems better suited. Also, looks like it should be possible to also handle removal via a...
Okay, I've taken most of the changes in this PR together with some others in the `performance` branch (https://github.com/PaulUithol/Backbone-relational/tree/performance). Please try that one if you're interested. I've also converted `remove`...