Paul Klint
Paul Klint
The only solution is to *not* generate this message. Is that desirable? I am not so sure about this. Or is there another solution viable?
This is a fair point Rodin, I need to figure out how to filter such duplicates.
I concur with the above ideas. Let's do this in stages and let's try to preserve the version history.
I added the interpreter label, since the compiler handles this as expected.
We have already tests for this case in `lang::rascal::tests::concrete::SubscriptAndSlice` but these are currently ignored for the interpreter.
I am aware of this, ignore it for now. I have to figure out how to avoid this.
And also please add dependency on https://marketplace.eclipse.org/content/apt-m2e-connector
Oops, you are completely right: two missing cases. Thanks!
Solving this in the type checker is trivial (have already fixed it). For the compiler I have to study this a bit more: to my surprise `IDateTime` does not provide...
Indeed! This means that I will have to port that code to the runtime of the compiler.