Carlos Parada
Carlos Parada
> This one is interesting, but is it numerically stable? Yes, there shouldn't be any problems with it. The only possible numerical problem is if the data aren't scaled and...
> Hey guys! Thank you for the links and discussion. It looks good to me. Would you like to give it a go at drafting a class? I think so,...
@solegalli do you know how I can add a new transformer to the existing tests? I'm not sure where I can find the tests.
> * Keep var as-is, fix std, update docs to refer to circular statistics I believe this is the intention; I'd be happy to review a PR on this if...
> This was solved by #951 before I stopped working on it by imputing return type from parameter type where appropriate. It had been an ongoing bugbear of mine, but...
I'd like to ask for a decision on this again; besides ruling out GPU support, machine learning applications, compatibility with other packages (which try to preserve types), and precisions other...
This looks like a pretty solid implementation, but I do wonder if we should be adding Log* distributions piecemeal like this, rather than providing a more general interface for transformed...
Any objections to merging this?
Anything else to do before merging?
Anything else or can I merge?