Pankraz76

is this any good ? #16820

> need to break this up into smaller parts No, you just need to checkout or copy and recreate my test (in a few seconds - much faster than talking...

I'm really wondering if this is the right way to appreciate and deal with customer feedback provided. At rewrite, we try to make things as easy as possible without enforcing...

As I'm pointing out a 90%+ failure rate, it's pretty clear that the software implementation is flawed and the tests are too, as we surely have 100% test coverage but...

Here we go again: https://github.com/checkstyle/checkstyle/pull/16823 It's all fitting on one screen. If you still can't reproduce and acknowledge this, then it's clearly an emotional/personal issue that needs someone else to...

If you still insist on templates and can't help me just this once by doing it yourself, then please say so clearly so we can find someone actually capable of...

Please provide the template by checking out my example or show me once so I can learn from it. I've thought deeply about this and believe we can fix the...

or here - second example: #16810 checkout, run, test-fails: costing me 5 seconds, did it myself as this is foreign to me as well. ``` missing (41) : 25, 26,...

> This Check is very old, and unfortunately very broad in design. #16780 We might need a breaking change migrating from `Treewalker` to `FileParser`. `AbstractFileSetCheck` "is not allowed below this"...

> That said, the tone of your replies comes across as entitled and dismissive. This is a volunteer-driven project, and respectful collaboration is key. true, even this is not my...