Peter Strömberg
Peter Strömberg
Makes total sense leaving the file there with a comment like that.
Another option is to only inform the user about the situation. If Calva doesn't find the file, it informs: ”If this is a Babashka project clojure-lsp needs it to have...
Moving this to a comment on this issue, to keep it more general on the need to inspect results. From @orestis: > I never liked the actual UI of the...
Thanks for this awesome Joyride example, @orestis! Please consider contributing it to the Joyride repo. About opening portal. Maybe make the script do that as well? The script could check...
Yes, can and should be done! Please file an issue about it. 😄
Also the regular tree-views is already something to consider for navigating the structures. I have a branch somewhere where I experimented a bit with that...
> It looks like the Portal folks are happy with the state of the world at this point -- is there still active interest in the OP topic? Active, idk,...
We're about to release a version of Calva with an inspector view. It's nothing like the CIDER inspector, and it lives entirely in string land. But it covers a lot...
It's a goal with the grammar and parsing in Calva that the Reader hold the truth. So this is a bug. It only really affects the look of that symbol,...
This is what I mean: * Without clojure-lsp: * With clojure.lsp: Inspecting the tokenization we can see it spelled out: