ΘLΞG

I see, so in essence you don't really need the state sharing, but you need to define a pipeline that chains multiple middleware instances together. Is it correct? One thing...

Yes, exactly, this sounds like something I also was thinking about. To some extent, I think the first step might be splitting `AstSchemaBuilder` in 2 interfaces: once with `build*` methods...

Thanks for reporting this! It's quite interesting that it does not work with macro.... I already had this issue and I thought that I fixed it in this commit: https://github.com/sangria-graphql/sangria/commit/4fe395252a400f2d383f25b01ef0cc995dbfc380....

No, I afraid it would not be possible since reflection/macro API does not expose scaladoc information.

Sorry for the late reply. `@GraphQLField` at the moment does not support the distinction between `null` and undefined values. Though you can add `ctx: Context[Ctx, Val]` function argument. This will...

It's hard to provide a suggestion based in the information you have shown. I would definitely recommend you to check this project: https://github.com/OlegIlyenko/graphql-gateway It provides some examples of combining together...

In general yes, I think so. Have you already see this discussion? https://github.com/graphql/graphql-js/issues/53 I think it provides some context. Do you think that sangria implements this validation differently from reference...

Yeah, unfortunately there is no out-of-the-box support. One thing that I can recommend you to check is a `ReplaceField` macro setting. Here is an example: ``` scala val tpe =...

It would be cool if you could check it out! At the moment I'm not quite sure how to signal that particular field needs a projection (it's probably only relevant...

Thanks for the suggestion! I was not sure whether it would be very useful since normally not many interfaces are exposed, so I haven't implemented it yet. But if you...