Stephan Engberg

I would suggest lack of clarity as the problem and further the real objective as they can be inferred are close to the opposite of regulation. See e.g. on terminology...

> When the user needs to give some information to "informed parties" (also known as "relying parties") in a way that does not disclose the information included in the PID,...

> PIDs should be represented according to national identification formats, which may vary from country to country. Indeed. National identity differs - but you cannot call yourself a democracy if...

> It is not necessary to explicitly support pseudonymy in all PID formats. PIDs should be represented according to national identification formats, which may vary from country to country. When...

I can only acknowledge the problems stated and how far the ARF are from even a minimum solution that deliver on the initial eIDAS 2.0 claims. Anyone having tried to...

"Technically enforced privacy does not exist. The best you can hope for is to increase the cost of correlation, and technical means is just one way. eIDAS 2.0 is not...

@Sebastian-Elfors-IDnow The ETSI report is a comprehensive and thorough work. IMHO. The main problem with the report is that it fails to point to the basic fact that these claims...

May I suggest a very simple test. If ARF Type 1 does not support trustworthy anonymity and trustworthy pseudonymity (trustworthy anonymity with some data minimized/not backdoored data minimized accountability), then...