Nutomic

> I mean ActivityPub protocol publish all this data across the network to all instances, which is by design public. No, only to the instances which sent a `Follow` request...

Ive been talking with @julianlam about the same topic. His idea is an implementation based on FEP 7888, similar to the one provided by NodeBB. To make it simple: -...

We also dont store the IDs of activities associated with particular actions, so thats not possible.

Copying from @aeharding's direct message: >I was thinking about a good middle ground that would be a win-win: > >What if Lemmy extracted all non-local links, and then provided a...

Links are only rewritten by your local instance (where your account is registered), and the instance where a post is displayed. So the only way someone could see your post...

The code would get much more complicated with this because we would have to add new database tables to store url mappings, and include them in the api. The markdown...

The problem is that it requires a lot of work to change something that already works perfectly fine. Lots of apps/clients wont have time for that, or wont even know...

No, the backend still has to parse all incoming posts for image links and store them in `RemoteImage` table to pass [this check](https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/blob/main/crates/routes/src/images/download.rs#L61) (to prevent Lemmy from being abused as...

This would be pretty easy to seperqte by putting it into separate tabs. In both the subscriptions and the profile view, you get a tab "uploads" that shows the same...

I think steam is doing something similar with game curators, but i'm not sure how well that works in practice (never used it).