Noah Ma

I don't know how to test in `manual.scrbl` that `math` interprets superscript and subscript correctly, maybe I should directly test that `pregexp` is correct?

I just realized that we can achieve similar functionality by defining functions: ```racket (define ^ (compose superscript math)) (define _ (compose subscript math)) ``` I'm not sure if this PR...

When implementing mathematical functions in Racket, especially in algebra-related contexts, I find that using `(∘ g f)` feels quite harmonious within the surrounding expressions. Additionally, I've noticed that S-expressions can...

Actually, the Racket-based documentation on category theory I’m working on only uses features provided by `#lang racket` and doesn’t rely on any additional libraries. In a sense, this represents an...

> Does this addition cause any code on the package server to fail to compile? I searched for this [symbol](https://docs.racket-lang.org/search/index.html?q=%E2%88%98). The results show that four packages provide `∘`, including my...

> In my opinion t is not worth the trouble having ∘ be an alias compose. First of all we in general don't have aliases (I can only think of...

> I see lots of ∘s in registered packages, too, including ctp, elle-lib, pch-toolkit, xlist, csc104 (and formica and subtemplate, although those appear to have preexisting conditions). @NoahStoryM, does adding...

I searched for files containing the ∘ symbol and found 60 [files](https://github.com/search?q=language%3Aracket+%E2%88%98+NOT+is%3Afork&type=code) on GitHub. After excluding cases where ∘ is used in strings, I identified 16 repositories where ∘ is...

I tested the repositories and encountered failures in the following (For some repos I wasn't sure how to test, so I simply ran the files containing ∘) : ``` [FAIL]...

> If this is added, I'd favor ∘ and ∘₁ (rather than ∘1). I like ∘₁. Thank you for pointing this out.