Noah Ma

It must be perfect if there were some tools to convert new syntax code and s-exp code to each other.

@AlexKnauth Is it necessary for s-expr to be indented well? Why not use some function to format code (just like some editors' work)?

> Did you have a concrete use case for this? Mutable lists and pairs are generally discouraged in Racket, I'm not sure making them easier to use is a good...

At first I also thought about adding `for/mlist` to the `compatibility-lib` package, but considering the consistency between `mlist` and `list`, I felt that the definitions of `for/list` and `for/mlist` should...

Thanks, I'll learn it later. Feel free to close the PR if you feel it's better to define `for/mlist` in `compatibility-mlist`. (And I plan to add more useful operators for...

Hi @capfredf , I don't know how to use `match*` to solve this problem, can you help me with an example?

> Change 2 would affect existing code. If you really think this is necessary, enable this behavior via a new keyword. I'm stuck in a weird problem, which seems to...

> > Change 2 would affect existing code. If you really think this is necessary, enable this behavior via a new keyword. > > I'm stuck in a weird problem,...

I can understand the downside of using parameters, do I need to remove `json-inf` and `json-mhash?` parameters and only enable these behaviors via keywords?

Considering Typed Racket , should I allow `read-json` to read `+inf.0` and `-inf.0`?