David Nicholson

🎉 excellent, thank you @skrawcz I will reply in more detail tomorrow or Friday (have jury duty 😕) but we do already have an editor lined up. > Though I'm...

Hi @skrawcz and thank you for taking the time to make the full submission. I need to ask about one aspect of Hamilton we did not discuss before. I see...

> No, but I just added it - [stitchfix/hamilton#302](https://github.com/stitchfix/hamilton/pull/302). Thank you 🙏 I think this goes a long way towards alleviating our concerns, and is similar to what [Homebrew does](https://github.com/Homebrew/brew/blob/master/docs/Analytics.md#anonymous-aggregate-user-behaviour-analytics)...

Hi @skrawcz, following up on this: I did have a chance to discuss with our exeuctive director @lwasser. She has decided we cannot proceed with this review until we have...

Hi @skrawcz thank you again for your patience. @lwasser has gotten input on telemetry from our own community, the scientific Python community, rOpenSci and other open source community leaders. Based...

Thank you @AlexanderJuestel for opening this and for linking back to #126. I have gone ahead and started looking for an editor for this review. Please do let us know...

Not sure if I spotted the issue but I replied there: https://stackoverflow.com/a/76908429/4906855 You can also feel free to ask for help in our Discourse in the future (https://pyopensci.discourse.group/) (or now,...

Hi @AlexanderJuestel just checking back. I think we do have an editor that can run this review. I know we were helping you with the API docs build but I'm...

Very understood, thank you @AlexanderJuestel. I do not mean to rush you. I think Leah is out of town right now but should be back on-line next week. Early next...

Hi @AlexanderJuestel, could you clarify a little? > I have not made any progress on the tests yet. I see you have a set of tests but it looks like...