Nick Crews

Thanks for this issue @matthewdeanmartin. I feel like in hindsight, it would have been nice if the original forker had named the package (package meaning what you use with `import...

See [the discussion I started on discuss.python.org](https://discuss.python.org/t/impacts-advice-for-changing-package-name-in-1-0-release/16138). I emailed the listed `docopt` maintainer for transferring the name of `docopt` on PyPI.

@h4l sorry I just left a few thoughts but I don't think I'm done with a review yet. Let me look at this a bit more before you go and...

@h4l those fixups look great! Just a few more tiny requests. The large one ("what terminates an --option?") can be a separate PR if you want to just get this...

Brilliant, thank you so much @h4l! I'll close #38 as it was superseded by this. OK, so now I'm trying to summarize what were the changes, to determine if version...

Awesome, thanks for helping me wrap my head around it. I'll bump from 0.8.1 to 0.9.0 and add this summary to the CHANGELOG

Hey there @con-f-use @cjwelborn, I've picked this project up as a new maintainer. At this point, I don't feel comfortable merging this. Sorry that you've both in in some effort...

> Not really it doesn't change any existing functionality You're right, it doesn't break anything so far, but it does diverge from the spec. I'm sorry, but I don't feel...

> Not sure, but you seem to think that the --long-opt= notation is not part of the spec Sorry, I wasn't super precise here upon re-reading what I wrote. You're...

> @NickCrews Can you elaborate what is the "original spec" and why adding types and default values make us drift away from it? Hi! Good to hear that someone else...