Alexander Neumann

Hmm i don't get why CI is always rebuilding so much if I basically only change a single port. From my point of view it should just rebuild the affected...

> In the last hours, there were a lot of merges to master. This affects your PR's dependencies. Now that CI is actually controlled by changed ABI hashes (not cache...

so i will ignore all x64-linux errors. First the dependency tree needs to be corrected to consider the x ports which is out of scope for this PR since there...

@JackBoosY theoretically yes. I still have more x ports but without proper testing on linux, i doubt it make sense to add them currently, since they don't build on windows.

> There are a lot of big edits to make the various X libraries buildable on Windows here. Is upstream interested in supporting a scenario like this and/or are those...

> If the issue is that we need some means of declaring dependencies that we don't provide in a better way that argues that we should provide such a mechanism...

> We want to see that upstream is at least notified for each of these patches. Feel free to do that but some patches are very windows specific and could...

> You can keep your branch and close this PR since we should split it. The problem with that it is that I lose it from github if I want...

I lose that list:  which is basically a todo list.

> without any amendments @JackBoosY Does merging with master count as an amendment? I basically need this PR to decide where to split again after https://github.com/microsoft/vcpkg/pull/22642 is merged and i...