TareqB

Results 11 comments of TareqB

Hi there, in my poor understanding of the EdiAttributes, the EdiSegmentGroup is treated as EdiSegment, that means, you cannot create an EdiSegment and then, create a EdiSegmentGroup out of it...

Hi @cleftheris, as I'm using reflection.emit to generate the POCO classes, it looks like a EdiPath (`CUX[0][0]`) because the ~~reflected constructor~~ EdiSegmentGroup.SequenceEnd.ToString() convert it to that: ```csharp private static void...

Hi, I'm not sure about which format is the simplified diagram, but I'm pretty sure the standards for that one differentiates between both NAD Segments with a different segment number,...

Here a working example where I have two NAD's (SG2 and SG5) for the following diagram (MSCONS) ![2017-04-26_09-17-15](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/3227198/25422641/df80acce-2a61-11e7-9efe-b51061af18ca.png) ``` [EdiSegmentGroup("NAD[0][0]", SequenceEnd = "UNS")] public class MSCONS_SG2 { [EdiValue("X(3)", Path =...

Playing around with your example: > +UNA:+.? ' > +UNB+UNOC:3+1234567891123:14+7080005059275:14:SPOTMARKED+101012:1104+HBQ001++++1' > +UNH+1+QUOTES:D:96A:UN:EDIEL2+S' > +AAA+1' > +AAA+2' > +AAA+3' > +UNS+D' > +AAA+1' > +BBB+INSIDE:THE:AAA:SG+1' > +AAA+2' > +BBB+INSIDE:THE:AAA:SG+2' > +AAA+3'...

So, playing around with your example, I saw it was missing one of the UNS so I modified it: > UNA:+.? ' > UNB+UNOC:3+1234567891123:14+7080005059275:14:SPOTMARKED+101012:1104+HBQ001++++1' > UNH+1+QUOTES:D:96A:UN:EDIEL2+S' > UNS+H' > AAA+1'...

Hi, I think you may be talking about CONTRL or APERAK?, I have to implement it as well but I have not think so much on it as first I...

Hi @KoosBusters, You are right, APERAK should be check after the serialisation of the message as it can exists different agreements from the standard ([AHB](http://www.edi-energy.de/)) (German) between partners. The CONTRL...

Hi, here an updated list of error codes that is valid since 01.10.2014 - Open, since the one you are referencing are quite old and the majority has been deprecated,...

Hi @KoosBusters, sorry for the late response, I was on vacations. I'm currently (still) working on the APERAK, I have made an xml for a specific process (MSCONS- 13008) with...