MrChico
MrChico
> > Without the ability to vote for multiple proposals, those updates would have to be baked together > > Or there would have to be multiple votes. > Well,...
Currently, the storage contents in all specs are not specified further than what is explicitly given in the spec. But the security of `dss` relies on some assumptions on storage,...
@livnev Yes, I think it's mainly about being more explicit about which contracts are authorized, and crucially which are authorized at the time of launch. If some new contract is...
> what we would really want is to just be able to query the deployed contracts on the blockchain and enumerate the set of keys A for which Vat.wards[A] ==...
This is definitely stronger than the claims we are making now, which would be satisfied by contracts that have `Vat.wards[A] |-> 1` for all `A`.
Good points. I overlooked the fact that the `add()` method is unauthorized. In light of that the checks make more sense, `vat.wards(adapter) == 1` being the crucial one. > I...
> I believe the entry was intentionally left out of this repo. With what intent?