Morten D. Hansen

Alright. Acknowledged. I do not know what it means though. Does it cause an issue i can proof?

It's a pretty good idea. I imagine it would make for a significant improvement when querying/filtering by tags on very large table.

Thank you for the thorough report! - and i did see the post in discord! It is on top of my to-do. I need to make sure we do it...

Hi. I am sorry about the missing response. We are a bit thin on maintainers for this package in terms of hours. I do not have any experience with Lumen....

Might be a bit late answer, but i do agree that the package should claim a more specific table name to avoid potential collisions. It will be done in an...

Hi, thanks for the PR! - Good solution! 😄 I merged the other one, but i'm leaving this one open for a bit to remember it since i am still...

Hi, thanks for the PR! - Good solution! 😄 I merged the other one, but i'm leaving this one open for a bit to remember it since i am still...

Thank you for contributing! Looks like a good fix! - I need a test proofing that this works as intended, and then i need to go over the failing test...

@erikn69 im not sure. I do remember fiddling with the date serialization, but i cant from looking at this identify if its a solved problem or something that needs checking....

I see the value of the idea. A bunch of operations could be pushed back doing this. Maybe let the observer trigger a new event that could queue for doing...