Mogyuchi

> @Mogyuchi made a good point that `github.ref_name` might not be the right name here, instead one should probably use `github.head_ref`. @corneliusroemer Sorry, I should have just said it straight....

…I feel like I need to explain how what is written in [restrictions-for-accessing-a-cache](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/caching-dependencies-to-speed-up-workflows#restrictions-for-accessing-a-cache) affects cache cleanup. Simply put, for example, if you have a pull request 123 with head(current) branch...

@jc-clark https://github.com/github/docs/pull/31582#discussion_r1486602743 > Therefore, I believe it is more appropriate to make this a separate pull request from https://github.com/github/docs/pull/31322 . What I wanted to say is that I don't want...

@jc-clark https://github.com/github/docs/pull/31582#issuecomment-1979764206 > What would you think of keeping `pull_request` as the triggering event here but adding a note above the example that links to "[`pull_request_target`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request_target)" and describes the cross-repo...

@themisir Are you using Safari? If you use another browser, you won't get an error. I tried - ⭕ Chromium 98.0.4758.102 snap, Mozilla Firefox 97.0 [Ubuntu 21.10 aarch64] - ⭕...