Mike Thompson

That is a good point @DBees. I'll add something about that in "background information".

I note that @jeremybennett is using Verilator v4.203 and @chanduputta is using v5.003. I have seen this behavior many times with the CVA6: you have to pick the just right...

I am able to compile with Verilator v4.100. I suggest you build it from source. Here is what I do: ``` $ cd my_working_dir $ git clone https://github.com/verilator/verilator $ cd...

Do you mean [this](https://github.com/openhwgroup/core-v-mcu/tree/master/emulation/quickstart#eclipse-ide) section? What SDK should we specify?

Fair enough. Is this urgent? I have not yet used the SDK and it would take me several days to figure it all out before I could write it up...

@gmartin102, have we attempted full-duplex operation of the SPI in simulation?

Yes, 97M is a little big. :smile: Perhaps we can create a Makefile rule to allow users to compile it from source? We do that for the `dpi_dasm` shared object...

Hi @hanfeng0114, thanks for your question. As you may know, FORCE is an [OpenHW Group](https://www.openhwgroup.org/) project. All our projects are supported by one or more members. In the case of...

Hi @Mohamed1984. Does this answer your question? If so, please close the issue. Thanks!

See also [CORE-V-VERIF #2496](https://github.com/openhwgroup/core-v-verif/issues/2496)