Mike McQuaid

Yeh, I also don't use this any more. Happy to help debug.

@SMillerDev somewhat but I think it could be cleaned up. It still references "Bottle (binary package) installation support provided for macOS releases:" and then goes on to list Linux in...

Awesome thanks @issyl0 🎉

@EricFromCanada makes sense for me!

@matthiaz Yes, that will be the case. We'll review PRs to address this. Note we do not support non-interactive installs outside of `/home/linuxbrew/.linuxbrew`.

> Are you sure? The comments specifically mention `~/.linuxbrew` I'm sure that that's the intention, yes.

> I don't mean to sound harsh, just trying to understand here but why? > What is the upside that I'm currently missing that justifies the breaking of existing workflows....

> Why would binary packages not work? Do they hardcode /home/linuxbrew in the compiled code ? Yup, exactly.

> But not allowing an alternate home folder seems a bit overkill. We allow it through an alternative installation mechanism: https://docs.brew.sh/Installation#untar-anywhere We don't want to make it easy for users...

Passing on this for now. @christolis please reopen when complete and passing CI, thanks!