Ted Mansell (NOAA/NSSL)

@junwang-noaa Only one of the drafts will be used, depending on whether the RT tests for v1nssl should be converted to WoFS_v0 or not. I may have jumped the gun...

@RatkoVasic-NOAA > please try to run case Sure thing. Is there any particular current RT test that would be good? > by reversing MPI layout in input.nml file My experience...

@RatkoVasic-NOAA I guess it is expected that regional_3km has no real convection in the domain for a 6hr forecast? There doesn't seem to be much for the microphysics to do...

> Dynamics-only is reproducing results in different MPI layout, so should with physics (which is column-only and independent of MPI). Not completely column-only -- the Thompson interface (mp_thompson.F90) has 2D...

> These two names have to match to be able to run the regression test. @MinsukJi-NOAA Thanks for pointing that out! I renamed the file.

> could you please try to run case with this new SDF by reversing MPI layout in input.nml file. For example, if you have layout = 6,11 - try with...

The Thompson and NSSL schemes both have reproducible results in WRF, and the CCPP versions likely do not change that. Since the two mentions SDFs with either scheme have different...

> 2\. One question for Ted: why GFS_suite_interstitial_3 > GFS_suite_interstitial_4 > are not included in the rrfs_v1nssl and WoFS_v0 SDFs? @ChunxiZhang-NOAA The interstitial routines are left out because there is...

> We need to run the ORT test(threading, decomposition, restart reproducibility test and debug test ) for new physics suite. @junwang-noaa Is there a particular procedure laid out somewhere for...

UPDATE: fd_nems.yaml file needed to be updated -- works now @junwang-noaa I'm trying to do some tests with a subdomain of the 2019061518 "student" test, and I'm getting an odd...