MichaelSchneeberger

> Maybe I'm missing something but why not using the `publish` operator which returns a connectable Observable for this particular case? Yes, this would solve the problem for this particular...

> By the way, since RxPY v3, the subscribe operator now have a scheduler parameter. However it does not and cannot behave the way you would like: The behavior of...

We adapted the `subscribe` methode on our local copy of the RxPY a while ago, and never had an issue with missing an element again. The adapted project can be...

> Thus you could instead use `NewThreadScheduler` so `zip` will finish the subscription of all sources before the item is sent down the pipeline. You can reproduce the same effect...

In RxJS, missing an element is somehow less of a problem, because a JavaScript application runs on a single thread. In RxJava, they have an `onSubscribe` method defined in the...

> In such situations, I always use asyncio in combination with ThreadPool schedulers (even when no asynchronous IO is used). Yes, this would solve the problem. I actually like this...