Laurent Orseau

I have no clue about what's going on here, sorry. I checked for impersonators (though I don't understand that stuff much) in case that would defeat the `eq?` but they...

Could it be about transparency, code inspectors and such, that behave differently in the two cases?

That's correct: ``` > (disassemble my-proc) # # inspector-object: invalid message 'code to object type 'record [,bt for context] ``` and by contrast: ``` > (require ffi/unsafe/vm) > (define extract-procedure...

Ah never mind, don't bother taking too much time with this. Thanks anyway, Laurent On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Greg Hendershott [email protected]: > @Metaxal https://github.com/Metaxal > >...

Great, thanks! Did you make any content update since then? Cheers, Laurent On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 7:53 PM, Greg Hendershott [email protected]: > I did (finally!) at least add...

I've had the same issue (surprisingly, the number of pages is correct!). I'm not sure how to solve this, but in the meantime there's a [workaround with this quickscript](https://gist.github.com/Metaxal/0b65f604bb7c7f5a446e7ad22fff85a2). It...

Reading all this strengthens my view and my preference that Rhombus should be "s-exp first, other syntaxes next". This doesn't prevent it from having a default supported alternative syntax that...

Agree to that. Also, while unifying the two, I'd like structs/classes to start with a capital, as a distinguishing feature. This would help readability of source code.

Regarding @jackfirth 's nicely presented 4 options, here's my unrequested opinion: * **Option 1** (OP proposal): Certainly interesting, worth investigating further—I was about to propose the same thing, before discovering...

you could also have `(a '(1 2))` for get in 2d arrays. Then `(a '(1 2) x)` still makes sense for set.