Michael Arndt

You're right, it has a lot of edge-cases. Maybe not worth it and causes more frustration than help. Maybe listing those limitations next to the export button is enough? Cannot...

Not on all pages, no; I haven't figured out what the factor is. I could share one page here?

That's the current state of one affected page (I used export page) ```markdown - Intro - About me - First there was Spring - … but declaring everything in XML...

A re-index doesn't help. I'm not able to reproduce the behaviour deterministically, but it keeps happening. I'll keep looking for a factor that is triggering the behaviour. In the meantime...

I don't see a problem with authentication (who did it), but with authorization (is that "who" allowed to do it). I can sign each change and validate the resulting signature...

@Steve-OH you're right, to make that work you either need byzantine quorum (as far as I know that's what usually happens in blockchains, but I'm by no means an expert)...

@pvh good thoughts, I need to think about them a bit more. From the top of my head: > if you lost your signing keys. Now the document's time would...

Thanks for spamming 😅 I read the blog article and I think I agree with everything in it. Especially the wording of attention vs privilege seems to be an improvement...

Great input so far, thank you all for that! My current stance is that there are 3 possibilities: 1. Like @bminer said [before](https://github.com/automerge/automerge/issues/419#issuecomment-975936232): only allow granting privileges, keep keys valid...

I've looked into this again and found that automerge now has a `patchCallback`. I was able to get the desired behaviour by throwing an exception from there. While that's not...