Tim Nugent

I think this and #151 may be related, they are both looking like IL2CPP build woes. I am leaving this up for now as I do some more testing, but...

ok so just for reference sake I also had some issues (not exactly the same but the same sort) in an IL2cpp webgl build. In particular the same crash in...

This is a cool idea, I think my main thought is any reason why this isn't better done as a line provider subclass? Line providers are already intended to be...

Hey-oh, thanks for the proposal, you've clearly put a lot of thought into it. One of the main reasons why we defined the compiled yarn programs as protobuf (with a...

Hey-oh, me again, thanks @JoshLee0915 and @xsduan for the comments, I hope I can shed some light on some of this stuff. > One thing I have with this is...

Originally I was more in favour of this, however as the language has evolved and grown in that time and as we see more people use it I am less...

Pretty much yes, albeit one without the weirdness of the C linker if possible…

Yeah sorry I think I spoke a bit too negatively about the edges cases of embeds, in fact almost every edge case of the embed also applies to the returns...

Yeah the fear of cycles was exactly why I initially said the best option would be to just ban embeds inside of an embed node. There was a decentish amount...

There's been a bunch of discussion around this feature internally and we are genuinely unsure as to the best way to proceed around this. We like bits and pieces of...