Mattias Sehlstedt

Results 16 comments of Mattias Sehlstedt

The issue seems to stem from [this change](https://github.com/swagger-api/swagger-core/pull/4445/files#diff-bed6aab5e29942b1a575bded333604f9dfaeb2ef9475f1433266ece4e49f4fcbR665-R679), where Schema-annotations are ignored if using the 3.1 parser. I have [created a branch](https://github.com/swagger-api/swagger-core/compare/master...Mattias-Sehlstedt:swagger-core:array-schema-annotation) were I have been able to restore expected...

Have you tried using the `io.swagger.v3.core.jackson.ModelResolver.enumsAsRef = true;` approach? (placing that definition as a static initialization in your application). Or is it the case that you do not want all...

Thanks for checking. Could you provide a [Minimal, Reproducible Example - with HelloController](https://stackoverflow.com/help/minimal-reproducible-example) that illustrates the problem? It would enable someone to more easily understand the exact problem and debug...

Most likely tied to the bump of [swagger-core](https://github.com/swagger-api/swagger-core) [here](https://github.com/springdoc/springdoc-openapi/pull/3105). It is the component responsible for most of the Java-object to OpenApi-specification translation. Could you state if you are exposing a...

My [attempt at reproducing the issue](https://github.com/springdoc/springdoc-openapi/commit/79fe3c5c7c93b1fc26c028f679113f1f4ce235cf) does not seem to yield the same results. Could you submit an example branch where you are able to reproduce the issue in this...

> https://github.com/cavazos-apps/springdoc-test This application exposes a 3.1 specification. I have verified that it is specifically tied to it being a 3.1 specification. See the [attempt](https://github.com/springdoc/springdoc-openapi/commit/ab020481b4ce67e27b33532133b0a62967b3b716) again. I have also verified...

I took part in bumping the version, and I saw some indications of a [change in behavior](https://github.com/springdoc/springdoc-openapi/pull/3105#discussion_r2421939101). But provided the changes made between 36 and 38, I do not really...

Hi @martin-mfg, An issue would occur if the client for example uses Lombok's `@SuperBuilder` to construct an object with ```java Cat.builder().color("red").build(); ``` The intent would then be that this would...

I have created an example of a case [here](https://github.com/Mattias-Sehlstedt/openapi-polymorphism/blob/main/src/test/java/PlaygroundTest.java#L26) where it is not possible to build the model with the Lombok builder (unless you manually set the discriminator value). This...

Does @wing328 have any input? I would argue against always having `@Nullable` on the discriminator, since it would make it unclear exactly what is expected. Especially since the setter for...