MatthiasWeise

I am not sure about the best approach for automatic schema generation. My feeling is that it depends a bit on your implementation strategy. What I would like to make...

I would expect that name from specification is also some sort of (user-readable) identifier. If that is not unique and no identifier is available you could report about missing uniqueness...

Having an `int_literal` might be a good option, although we could also argue that int is included in `real_literal`. In order to have more type safety we would have to...

Yes for SIZE metrics, but we still need real_literal for VALUE metrics.

We are using the same namespace as in ifcXML.xsd of IFC4 Add2 TC1 (https://standards.buildingsmart.org/IFC/RELEASE/IFC4/ADD2_TC1/XML/IFC4.xsd), but did not provide a schema location for download. Can you try to add the following...

Sorry, it seems I copied the old one ``

My understanding was that it should be a constraint (option 1). Conversion does not make sense to me.

We are running into the same question as mentioned by @hesrah. @Moult The need for further information is not really about explaining what is encoded in the rule. Main requirement...

> I think we should add this to the recommendation for implementers to simply show the localised version of the property. IFC contains translations of properties, and it would be...

> My interpretation is that the description describes why the specification exists, why it is valuable, why people need it, what usecases it is for, etc ... i.e. it is...