Matthias Farnbauer-Schmidt

Thank you, I was pretty sure that I simply placed the attribute false. Now it works 👍

Yes, in my application I don't validate subjects that much either. But frequently use the `Subject`s to parse messages I receive from subscription with wildcards to check out where it...

Yes, an integration of the `Subject` API into the crate was my long time goal. However, I was not sure if the work would be accepted so I waited for...

As predicted, incorporating `Subject` and `SubjectBuf` into the whole crate is a lot of work. At the moment I'm not done but the work in the crate itself is mostly...

The current implementation has a `contains_wildcards() -> bool` isn't that enough?

So after long time I have again some time to work on this. So far I got everything to compile again. Next I'll marge `main` to catch up with recent...

@caspervonb Finally, after months of delay this PR is ready for review, CI is passing, and `Subject` is introduced to the whole crate. I slimed the added features a bit...

BTW with the latest commit to #222 I changed `Subject` to wrap `str` instead of `&'s str` this makes converting `&str` to `&Subject` only a simple cast, i.e. a zero-copy...

Yes and no. Currently, there are `Subject::new_unchecked()` and `Subject::new()` where the first does a _zero-copy_ cast of `&str` to `&Subject` ,however, the string is not validated. The later is fallible...

Don't feel pressured to react to this PR immediately. I just need this for my own project to dive into procedural macros. My goal is to provide derive macros for...