Matt Fisher

@bbugyi200 What you describe doesn't quite match my understanding of the documentation in the "Future style" section of the docs, so I'm struggling to understand the intended behavior of the...

Hey, thanks so much for your response! I think the thing that I didn't communicate clearly is that the workflow really looks like this. In my example repository I omitted...

@djhoese I would love to! However, I'm a fairly new satpy user and I'm not sure how much, if any, time `$DAY_JOB` will give me to work on this, so...

Just wanted to throw my use case in the ring here: My project, [QGreenland](https://github.com/nsidc/qgreenland/), uses autodoc and we use autodoc's mocks for dependencies like `fiona` that can't, as far as...

I just found that this is supported via regex searches in `bump-my-version`. which looks to be this project's actively-maintained successor. https://github.com/c4urself/bump2version/issues/268 https://github.com/callowayproject/bump-my-version/pull/39/files

This functionality requires one or two pieces, depending on what you want to do. If you want to change a date from one date to the current date, e.g. updating...

I talked with Daniel Crumly about this (does he have a GitHub account? trying to @ him :) ). Learned the following from that discussion: These 0080v2 granuels are duplicate...

>However, if all valid granules should have RelatedUrls and all granules without are duplicates and will be cleaned up, I don't think we need to notify users about these granules....

I'm not sure if there's a way to tell the difference, honestly! I'll ask Daniel about this.

From Daniel (are these always duplicates or "to be cleaned up"?): >Not necessarily - it can also be data that is hidden for direct download access, but is still orderable...