Matt Delacour

> Apologies if this is too off-topic but couldn't find a better place to comment this. In case it's useful to anyone else, we ended up working around this lack...

Hi there 👋 , As I already explained to Willem, we built an higher level API on our side to make the life of our users easier It basically does...

> the main shift seemed to happen in #1911 introduced by @MattDelac This PR does not seem to have impact on performance. It could have impact of the columns selected...

> I think it wasn't any deep investigation. Was mainly trying to find changes to the query that happened in that timeframe and that PR being the main change Ok...

And at the end, this is the whole logic ```python def get_feature_metadata(store: FeastFeatureStore, features: List[str]) -> Dict[str, Dict]: metadata: Dict[str, Dict] = {} for feature in features: feature_view, feature_name =...

Thanks @woop, it worked like expected. Just needed to reinstall protobuf as you explained ``` export CFLAGS="-I$(brew --prefix protobuf)/include" export LDFLAGS="-L$(brew --prefix protobuf)/lib" # Please set the protobuf version below...

👋 Any progress on that issue? When using github actions, it would be nice to have something as handy as the docker GHA that spills out the digest https://github.com/docker/build-push-action#outputs

> There is a good reason — since our engine is asynchronous using the client asynchronously will be more performant I get the design decision 👍 just that it adds...

> This is not the case. The following pattern is okay to use: > > ```python > def foo(): > asyncio.run(bar()) > > async def bar(): > async with prefect.get_client()...