Matous Jobanek

- [ ] Resouce providers - add more constraints for `canProvide` method - qualifiers - [ ] sub-suite deployment with a help of Smart Testing tool and a new custom...

Hi, yeah, for parallel testing it is not the best solution. I didn't consider this use case. I'm not sure if there is another (easier) way of solving this than...

Hi @slaskawi, thanks for creating this issue. The feature looks very valid and definitely helpful for such a bit more complicated test cases. However, I'm afraid that I won't be...

Hi @rmpestano, thank you for your interest and for your offer. @vinsguru what do you think about Rafael's suggestion? I'm fine with anything that is suitable for both of you.

@rmpestano sorry for my long inactivity. As @vinsguru is not responding, I would say that you can (if you want) start moving the stuff forward on your forked branch. When...

> Currently affected strategy just works with black box testing(or white ones if ShrinkWrap or VertX runner is used). it is the other way around - currently, it works with...

From my side: generation points: * https://github.com/arquillian/arquillian.github.io/issues/377 * there is no way to look at the changes introduced in some PR - solutions: * take a screenshot and upload to...

I'm not 100% sure, but I would guess that these two commands: `awestruct --server -P production` `awestruct -P production --deploy` you can shrink to: `awestruct -P production -g --deploy` However,...

@hemanik @lordofthejars could you please take a look at this PR when you find some time? thanks a lot

thank you @leccyril for proposing the workaround. @Tibor17 @jurajcik does it fix the issue you are/were facing?