MasterO2
MasterO2
Any other comments on this feature request? Implementing this should be a no-brainer. IPv6 is the Internet of the future, so it's going to have to be supported at some...
> @MasterO2 , do you have IPv6 on your Internet connection? I do. Also, anyone else on most US-based ISPs will have it now as well, especially if you have...
> The main problem is that Chocolate Doom (currently) depends on SDL_net for networking, which doesn't have IPv6 support. I'd be in favour of dropping the dependency though and just...
Anything new on this issue, @Gustavo6046?
> > > Yes I think I'm ready now. I have more free time so I can do something :) @gustavo6046 Any progress?
> > > I already have a fork of Crispy Doom on my account, so GitHub doesn't let me fork Chocolate Doom (since technically the former is a fork of...
@brandonrobertz Go to https://www.discord.com and create an account. Then go to Staging's Discord Channel: https://discord.gg/WwAg3Xf
> > > > Also, for large directories that take more than one page to display, LS should be pipe-able to the `more` and `less` commands, since Staging's LS itself...
@Wengier In addition to adding the ability to pipe commands to Staging, would you also be willing to add the above improvements to the LS command?
Now that Staging has the ability to pipe, (https://github.com/dosbox-staging/dosbox-staging/commit/cca0084449f16d297d45ed6638f3c5134f743b9f), what does Staging want to do about improving Staging's implementation of the LS command?