MariusMyburg

> What about `std::optional` ? In this case you don't have an object saying why the error happened (like in `std::expected`), so that's just as good as an optional. >...

Understood, thanks. I was not aware of std:: optional, I will check it out today. If there is an existing mechanism to express this, that is good. But more than...

Hi Herb. Thanks! Cheers.

> Editors call: This is touching on the general topic of recommendations for error handling so we'll keep issue open and consider it together with related issues in that broader...