Mario Ishac

Since Python 2 has reached EOL, would it be worth reexploring this issue?

@florimondmanca I'll recheck the interaction between this PR and uvicorn multiprocessing to make sure I didn't miss anything. I also will take a look at how this PR behaves with...

I am working on writing the test, but it looks like `@pytest.mark.asyncio` already runs the test function in its event loop, so constructing the app within the test function will...

Hi @florimondmanca, Thank you for your reply. I'll admit I only recently jumped into `asyncio`, so it was hasty of me to classify this as a "bug" instead of asking...

@florimondmanca Yup I looked over this section of `Server`, what my merge request did was change it into effectively: ``` # uvicorn code loop = asyncio.new_event_loop() app = loop.run_until_complete(getapp()) async...

+1 on this, often IDS is required for compliance, and having it configurable via Terraform makes it reproducible.

@ftomassetti I have an instance of `MethodUsage` (forgot to say that in the original question, sorry about that). When looking through the possible methods, it only allows me to get...

> > You should have a method named typeParametersMap > […](#) > On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 at 02:01, Mario Ishac ***@***.***> wrote: @ftomassetti I have an instance of MethodUsage...

@ftomassetti @matozoid In the process of building a unit test for the expected behavior, I discovered that the implicit type arguments are actually discovered in a `MethodUsage` where the implicit...

@matozoid @ftomassetti I'm trying to become the new expert, but based on my unit tests it seems there's many more problems than just not accounting for the return type. I'll...