Marcus Dunn
Marcus Dunn
Could we use examples in the `returning` value of a `meta` block to access the fields?
I'm also running into this. It seems to degrade performance for llama-3-instruct. (Hackily replacing two new line with the single token improves performance anecdotally) I'd imagine there are other cases...
> Does anyone know what regex is used by LLaMA 3 to preprocess the text? Is this what you'd be looking for? https://github.com/meta-llama/llama3/blob/af6eedf7042fb51d00b2b26d8ef1ceaab73e1670/llama/tokenizer.py#L47
never mind I'm pretty sure this falls under > HLint operates on each module at a time in isolation, as a result HLint does not know about types or which...
Just wrote the python + spent way to long battling docker and python dependencies to get this working. Its far from fully featured but it suits our use-case well enough...
Unfortunately, that's no longer maintained (I just archived and re-made public) **I would highly recommend not using it** - there was a period of time where guidance was not maintained...
I believe it's unrelated.
For this one, the issue *I think* is that these both generate an index of `com.example.Foo::_ROOT_`, which is why the qualifier fixes it. I'm not sure exactly what a fix...
@arnaudgiuliani That test still fails with a stackoverflow on version 4.0.1. Could you reopen the issue?
@shraddhabang / @wweiwei-li could you take a look at this / what it would take to get it merged? This change would be a huge QoL improvement for our deployments.