Maxime Mangel

Results 1077 comments of Maxime Mangel

@Dzoukr Hello, Thank you I received all the invitation. Could you please check on Github, if it is possible to make me an owner (or increase my level). I asking...

@Dzoukr I renamed my existing repo, so I think it should work now

> ![image](https://private-user-images.githubusercontent.com/851307/432246424-96febbda-8af3-40c6-9eb8-16e2d2ccc692.png?jwt=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpc3MiOiJnaXRodWIuY29tIiwiYXVkIjoicmF3LmdpdGh1YnVzZXJjb250ZW50LmNvbSIsImtleSI6ImtleTUiLCJleHAiOjE3NDQyODYyNDQsIm5iZiI6MTc0NDI4NTk0NCwicGF0aCI6Ii84NTEzMDcvNDMyMjQ2NDI0LTk2ZmViYmRhLThhZjMtNDBjNi05ZWI4LTE2ZTJkMmNjYzY5Mi5wbmc_WC1BbXotQWxnb3JpdGhtPUFXUzQtSE1BQy1TSEEyNTYmWC1BbXotQ3JlZGVudGlhbD1BS0lBVkNPRFlMU0E1M1BRSzRaQSUyRjIwMjUwNDEwJTJGdXMtZWFzdC0xJTJGczMlMkZhd3M0X3JlcXVlc3QmWC1BbXotRGF0ZT0yMDI1MDQxMFQxMTUyMjRaJlgtQW16LUV4cGlyZXM9MzAwJlgtQW16LVNpZ25hdHVyZT01ZWE4ODZjY2JjMWM4YjYxZTRlMGI3MWY4ZGU1N2MxZjQzMjY5ZDBhYmY1ZjMwNjMzZjNlODI4YzVkNDQ1MGY3JlgtQW16LVNpZ25lZEhlYWRlcnM9aG9zdCJ9.jkaIOizgIhzOg47h-HhMxaDgsIrbrpUrBHUXW9aKQ_I) > > Now I don't get it. But if I delete/archive this and we will just call yours as the only one? 🤔 Perhaps, this is because my...

@Dzoukr I deleted my fork can you please try again ?

Thank you, @tforkmann I will re-open/merge my PR later this week.

Sure we can wait for a response from him. > Let me see if Alfonso responds. I think I have collaboration access to Feliz.Engine, so we wouldn't need to fork...

> I think I can rebuild Feliz.Engine.Bulma, but I don't know about Fable.ShadowStyles. @davedawkins What do you mean by rebuild? Are you speaking about creating the package or the ability...

@davedawkins Right so for @AngelMunoz, the reason for a rebuild of Fable.ShadowStyles is to lowered FSharp.Core requirements. See #89 for more context 😇

It seems like you should not use `React.functionComponent` anymore: https://github.com/Zaid-Ajaj/Feliz/blob/6841c9b150db7d73f1c9549ede07964949b5eaf0/Feliz/Internal.fs#L17-L28 The warning is wrongly configured, and should be updated to something like `#if FABLE_COMPILER_3 || FABLE_COMPILER_4 || FABLE_COMPILER_5` or even...

What if instead of always re-creating the DOM element Sutil used something like that: 1. If the element to render and the one existing at that place in the DOM...