Maxime Mangel
Maxime Mangel
@Dzoukr Hello, Thank you I received all the invitation. Could you please check on Github, if it is possible to make me an owner (or increase my level). I asking...
@Dzoukr I renamed my existing repo, so I think it should work now
>  > > Now I don't get it. But if I delete/archive this and we will just call yours as the only one? 🤔 Perhaps, this is because my...
@Dzoukr I deleted my fork can you please try again ?
Thank you, @tforkmann I will re-open/merge my PR later this week.
Sure we can wait for a response from him. > Let me see if Alfonso responds. I think I have collaboration access to Feliz.Engine, so we wouldn't need to fork...
> I think I can rebuild Feliz.Engine.Bulma, but I don't know about Fable.ShadowStyles. @davedawkins What do you mean by rebuild? Are you speaking about creating the package or the ability...
@davedawkins Right so for @AngelMunoz, the reason for a rebuild of Fable.ShadowStyles is to lowered FSharp.Core requirements. See #89 for more context 😇
It seems like you should not use `React.functionComponent` anymore: https://github.com/Zaid-Ajaj/Feliz/blob/6841c9b150db7d73f1c9549ede07964949b5eaf0/Feliz/Internal.fs#L17-L28 The warning is wrongly configured, and should be updated to something like `#if FABLE_COMPILER_3 || FABLE_COMPILER_4 || FABLE_COMPILER_5` or even...
What if instead of always re-creating the DOM element Sutil used something like that: 1. If the element to render and the one existing at that place in the DOM...