davedawkins
Issue with `Feliz.Engine` package
Sutil is using Feliz.Engine for providing an HTML DSL.
The problem is that Feliz.Engine, is not maintained anymore and @alfonsogarciacaro is the only person that has access to the NuGet package.
This is a problem because Feliz.Engine has a few missing API:
- https://github.com/davedawkins/Sutil/issues/62
- https://github.com/alfonsogarciacaro/Feliz.Engine/issues/22
- https://github.com/alfonsogarciacaro/Feliz.Engine/issues/13
I think Sutil should look how to upgrade in the future. I see 2 solutions:
- Fork Feliz.Engine
- Look into F# existing HTML DSL (there are quite a few 😅) and see if it is possible to re-use an existing one. Or perhaps, if Sutil or the existing HTML DSLs are flexible enough people could use their preferred one to minimise the maintenance.
I have asked Alfonso for access to the nuget package.
Regarding option (2) - this was the point of creating Feliz.Engine, to have a single implementation that other libraries could use.
Let me see if Alfonso responds. I think I have collaboration access to Feliz.Engine, so we wouldn't need to fork the repo, but we might need to create another package
Sure we can wait for a response from him.
Let me see if Alfonso responds. I think I have collaboration access to Feliz.Engine, so we wouldn't need to fork the repo, but we might need to create another package
Sure, depends if you have full access or limited access I suppose.
I think I can rebuild Feliz.Engine.Bulma, but I don't know about Fable.ShadowStyles.
@davedawkins What do you mean by rebuild? Are you speaking about creating the package or the ability to push the package to NuGet. Because the blocking part if the second one, as you need to have the admin/owner access on NuGet site.
Hello @AngelMunoz, I see that you are the owner of Fable.ShadowStyles. If needed are you still active for maintaining the project or depending on the need would you be ok with adding new maintainers.
Perhaps, @davedawkins can clarify why he mentioned that specific project. I am only starting to experiment with Sutil so I am not well too verse in its code base / needs.
@MangelMaxime I think you've posted this into the wrong issue. You're responding to an issue about FSharp.Core
@davedawkins Right so for @AngelMunoz, the reason for a rebuild of Fable.ShadowStyles is to lowered FSharp.Core requirements.
See #89 for more context 😇