Maxime Mangel

> I don't think this is appropriate since it prevents users from having full control - maybe they have a good reason for `CheckAdditionalContent` to be disabled? That's what I...

> I dont know about enforcing some values, maybe we need to be flexible here. I implemented it similar in my solution but this function was in a shared project...

I am re-opening because we want to provide ability to the user to customise the options

> That said, I am not a huge fan of slowing down compilation to prepare it for extraordinary situations I don't know if I would call this situations uncommon. Because,...

> Did you clock these with the Booster turned off (`standalone: true`)? > > `` Setting `standalone: true` does seems to always generate an output yes.

> `standalone: true` turns the Booster off and compilation times skyrocket. Normally, most projects should compile

I stumble on this issue while trying to use [Verify](https://github.com/VerifyTests/Verify) for writing my tests. This is unfortunate because when designing a library it's common to mark types as `private` or...

> Should fable generate a bundle, even if compilation fails? Fable don't generate bundles, it generates 1 JS file per F# file. But indeed, in theory Fable should invalidate the...

> The dependencies do not change Sorry, what do you mean by that? In the first, one you mentioned: 1. Compile with a missing dependency - `dotnet fable` 2. Install...

> Sometimes I find compiling with fable will break the links, and I'm not sure how this works; probably to do with the intermediate steps that fable takes to compile...