Manalclay

Hi @hamogu, I misunderstood the purpose of the astropy tick box. At the moment we do not aim GALAssify to be an affiliated astropy package. I'm editing the description and...

Thanks to you for the information, we confirm that we do not set the `astropy` label for this submission.

Hello @Batalex , thank you for your words! Yes, we plan to open a submission referencing this pre-submission issue. While reading the **Technical Checks** of the submission form, we found...

Hello again! Thanks for your patience. Finally, I could get the testing suite and the CI working flawlessly in the package repo. Therefore, I just open a submission for this...

Dear pyOpenSci team, I posted this submission with my other personal (non-scientific) GitHub account (@Malclay). I hope this won't be a problem. If so, please let me repost this submission...

Hello again! > Sorry, I just went back to #189 and saw that we already discussed this in [#189 (comment)](https://github.com/pyOpenSci/software-submission/issues/189#issuecomment-2144964171) a few months ago. I'm sorry I forgot - please...

Hello @SimonMolinsky ! First of all, thank you very much for your words and for your revision, which we really appreciate. My colleague @andonij and me are addressing the points...

Hello @SimonMolinsky, > I'm sorry that your package didn't meet the scholarly effort criteria in JOSS. JOSS review and decisions are not a problem for us, but I needed to...

HI @SimonMolinsky, Finally, we decide to focus on the pyOpenSci review as you said. Therefore, you can proceed without taking into account the JOSS requisites. Thanks for your patience.

Hi @SimonMolinsky, Currently, all methods are documented. In order to make the documentation easier for anyone who wants to contribute, we're preparing a minimal sphinx web page ('readthedocs' style) to...