Cedric Sodhi

I suppose this is done as by #119 ?

Question, 2.2.0 tries to link against `-lGL` and therefore fails on modern X11 free systems. #340 mentions that, too, but I'm not very clear what's the situation there; is the...

Thanks @nigels-com ! Would it be possible to generally assume libglvnd and link against `-lOpenGL` *without* configuration? Systems without libglvnd would be inherently outdated, is my naive understanding. I suppose...

Is GLEW interested in the window system bindings EGL/GLX? If it really only ever links against OpenGL, then I think switching over to cmake would be effort without a lot...

Ok, it links against `-lGLX` and I can see GLX syms in the code; I didn't think of it like that. I thought GLEW only concerned OpenGL itself, but not...

I don't think the ABI is affected here. The symbols are still the same and just in different libraries. That said, `-lGL` should probably be replaced by `-lOpenGL` everywhere, not...

Please forgive my ignorance (I'm notoriously a bit daft when it comes to maintaining compatibility), but where is the actual problem if a newer release of GLEW depends on other...

I fail to understand what concrete problem a change of dependencies would create or how this affects binary compatibility (i.e. being able to depend on a newer version of GLEW...

I suppose the reasonable way forward is then to just assume packagers will configure it directly with LDFLAGS or, at most, expose a dedicated `make` variable to just switch between...

Sure, could you please specify the logcat command that you want me to upload? FWIW, Here is '*:W', in the other ones I find nothing relevant (but I can easily...