Matthew Seal
Matthew Seal
The silent failure is surprising here. > How would that work, keeping in mind that we support all the way back to 2.6? I believe it's possible to do version...
Be aware a lot of download traffic is bot driven. So downloads may not be reflective of actual user percentages as there's a fair bit of old tooling churning away...
> 3) Propose it as an official subproject of Jupyter > As it fulfills wider Jupyter-ecosystem need and can support multiple frontends. > > Given not-yet-mature state, we could live...
Thanks for posting the extra details. That PR is a lot of code to grok so I'm still playing catch up on what it's doing. What that does tell me...
Ahh looks like we overwrite the file with each stream. We'd need to patch papermill to make that work correctly. For now you'd need to send to separate files and...
Failure that's left is already fixed in main -- going to merge instead of trying to pull the base up to the PR
Yes I think Python3.13 might force the issue anyway, but I agree we need to redo the setup.py / requirements pattern.
For now it's a constraint of the implementation it seems. We could improve that '=' check to check after doing quoted string capture groups to get around it. But someone...
Can we get a draft version without the linting / quoting changes? Would be a lot easier to review / iterate if we can undo that part for now.
Thanks @astrofrog -- on the botocore build part I am working on getting a new release out anyway and need to fix dep updates since the last one regardless.