MGX-CODING comments

Repositories
Issues
Comments

Results 3 comments of


                                            MGX-CODING

signal(Observable<T>) to signal<T>() operator

> I personally find using toSignal() and toObservable() perfectly reasonable here since you precisely want to transform a signal to an observable and vice-versa. > > The code could be...

signal(Observable<T>) to signal<T>() operator

Well on that we agree, maybe I should have said concise then ... Can this issue remain open, just to have more opinions ? (Thanks again for the more concise...

signal(Observable<T>) to signal<T>() operator

Just so we're clear, this was one example amongst others, this is not related to form controls in any way, shape or form. But thank you for the feedback on...