LynnDelgat

Alternatively, "otu_class_appr" could be made more inclusive (see also https://github.com/GenomicsStandardsConsortium/mixs/issues/603), to not only clustering methods, but also denoising methods (e.g. "Tool and parameteres used when clustering and/or denoising reads."). In...

@turbomam To enable meaningful searches and groupings, it would probably be easier to split each component into separate fields, but I suggested this term in analogy with other existing terms,...

@only1chunts Thank you. I noticed no labels were added yet, but I don't know when the next monthly call is? (would be happy to attend if I can)

@only1chunts Thank you very much for the clarification! So if I try to summarize from the metabarcoding/MIMARKS standpoint: otu_seq_comp_appr: not applicable otu_class_appr: clustering tool and parameters otu_db: reference database used...

@sformel-usgs Thanks for your input! Indeed, the GBIF guidelines seem to not match with the MiXS definitions in certain cases, which is what triggered me to open this issue so...