LuemmelSec

Okay, it somehow mangles the output:  Currently don't know why that is.

Okay, I am mistaken. This is a "problem" that was introduced to the code somewhere back in time. Tried it with the most current original code, and it is the...

furi_hal_version.c, should of course be excluded. Sorry, my bad at this stage.

> > The header can actually look like this: > > 2c000[0-6]000[1-9]000[0-1]000[0-5]200000 > > Do you have explanation for that? Sure: https://luemmelsec.github.io/Go-away-BitLocker-you-are-drunk/ https://github.com/WithSecureLabs/bitlocker-spi-toolkit/pull/3 https://labs.withsecure.com/publications/sniff-there-leaks-my-bitlocker-key

I also looked at this, but think it was only text.

Okay, so I fiddled a little bit around. In my case I get error responses from the SOAP requests: 0000208D: NameErr: DSID-0310028C, problem 2001 (NO_OBJECT) This related to not found...

Okay, I can even further narrow it down. In a forest, where you query the child domain (at least in that specific case) you run into those problems. If I...

This would be super duper awesome. Just had a usecase where I just would have wanted to duplicate an audit, just to find out this is not possible.

Hey mate, I just deployed it out of the box, did nothing special to it. Maybe the newer versions are already patched to it?

Sure, just let me know how. FYI tested it also on my Commando VM with the same results.