Cristian Le

I have tried it on `rawhide` just in case and I got the same issue, so it seems a wider issue ```console $ packit srpm 2024-09-18 10:18:44.382 packit_base.py DEBUG Packit...

Actually there is a use-case when the downstream srpm needs to use actions, e.g. with packages that have a script to download and sanitize the source to remove non-free files...

`push-gateway-no-tls-provider` should work. Just fearful if this would eventually propagate to other variations, but probably it's not relevant for a while. Let me get a second pair of eyes from...

Indeed, I was trying more to get an overview of what needs prioritization, what we should deffer to other projects, what needs help, which topics are difficult to research/could use...

I remember what exactly I was aiming with this issue. Indeed static context can work, but the difficult part is if we want to use an index name or a...

I come from Fedora packaging [^1] and this is part of the removal of questionable default options in `cmake` macro. But for sure try to contact the other distro packagers....

This would be quite serious issue to address if this project is to be packaged in downstream. Do you remember what parts were copied from where?

Thank you very much, much appreciate the references. @karypis as a plan of action for these, if you still have contact with the original authors you can ask to re-license...

The pkg-config installation did not seem to be picked up ``` Here we go! Running before_all... + choco install -y --no-progress --no-color cmake>=3.28 ``` It seems the `build.yml` file that...

> I can see that `PKG_CONFIG_PATH` is defined and points to the location of Python `.pc` files Ah right, I confused it for the `PKG_CONFIG_EXECUTABLE`. Hmm, indeed making that point...