Ethan Pippin

I see their value as variadics and extensions on sequence - Swift [has the variadic freestanding](https://developer.apple.com/documentation/swift/min(_:_:_:_:)) for `min/max` as well as the `min/max` on `Sequence`. I can implement them here...

Do we actually want to mirror Swift's structure of the binary and variadic `min/max` for the freestanding implementations? ex: have `lcm(_:_)` and `lcm(_:_:_:_:)`

I personally do not have a situation where I need to compute the `lcm/gcd` often enough to make a strong argument for anything. A point for freestanding variadic could be...

Apologies, after my caffeine high I have updated the PR description with the proper reasoning and justifications for this proposal which should have been there to begin with.

> In practice, variadic functions for these are going to be less useful than operations on sequences: I do also agree, however I reiterate that variadic parameters are targeted towards...

Will be done in #593.

There is no technical issue, just a local replacement would be needed.

I really don't like any idea where the prompt is part of the image name. Prompts are at least dozens of characters and can be up to hundreds.

What type of library are the books in?

I will play around with this for a while and see if this is the way that we should just finally handle it, see #258.