Landon Clipp

I am in favor of this approach, I think this is the same general idea as the original PR. Is there something substantial different here?

Thanks! We'll get this merged.

The tests are failing and seem to be generating the code that was _previously_ expected. Was there some blip in a mockery dependency?

This looks like a legitimate issue. Without digging too deep into the code right now, it seems like this should be an easy fix (hopefully just changing some conditional branch...

D'oh! I think this should be fine to remove for people who send mocks to the `mocks` directory, but what about people who use `--inpkg`? They might rely on this...

I'm implementing a general change freeze to version 2 unless there is substantial benefits to be gained. This is something that we can apply to version 3. I will add...

I think we should think about better solutions than using switch statements. You can basically extend this problem recursively infinitely down the parameter tree. What if you have this: ```go...

Hey, thanks for sending in the issue. Please submit a PR and we can get this merged.

Yeah that's fine we can keep this open, sorry just trying to clear historic issues that may no longer be valid.

Thanks for the engagement everyone. Two quick thoughts I have, please refrain from commenting `+1`, we have thumbs up reactions which serve the same purpose! Second, I'm thinking there are...